Other Western analysts, though, were more hesitant and said that Ukraine should avoid striking Russia’s nuclear infrastructure.
“Not a wise decision on the part of Ukraine,” said Hans Kristensen, a nuclear arsenal expert at the Federation of American Scientists. “Bombers and military sites in general are different because they’re used to attack Ukraine.”
Thord Are Iversen, a Norwegian military analyst, said striking a part of Russia’s nuclear warning system was “not a particularly good idea… especially in times of tension.”
“It’s in everyone’s best interest that Russia’s ballistic missile warning system works well,” he said.
The Kremlin views its nuclear military facilities as prestige projects and striking them is considered particularly provocative.
One of Russia’s most modern radar systems, the Kremlin has deployed 10 Voronezh class installations along the Russian border. Each has a range of around 4,000 miles and can track 500 objects simultaneously.
Zelensky willing to step down in exchange for Nato membershipFor free real time breaking news alerts sent straight to your inbox sign up to our breaking news em
Kamala Harris takes swipe at Trump and Musk in first speech since leaving officeSign up for the daily Inside Washington email for exclusive US coverage and anal
LONDON — A British couple in their 70s who run education programs in Afghanistan have lost contact with their family after being detained by the Taliban ea
Zelensky willing to step down in exchange for Nato membershipFor free real time breaking news alerts sent straight to your inbox sign up to our breaking news em