Monday, November 18, 2024 8:06 PM
Image aggregated from Next.io.
The UK’s High Court sided with Flutter Entertainment on Friday (15 November) in a landmark case that probed whether operators owe a duty of care to their customers.
Property developer Lee Gibson first sued Flutter’s Betfair brand and its TSE Malta holding company in 2021 for over £1.4m [$1.8m] in losses, alleging staff had helped him circumvent problem gambling safeguards.
In the 46-page judgement, High Court Judge Bird dismissed Gibson’s claims in their entirety, stating Betfair neither violated the Gambling Commission’s Licence Conditions and Codes of Practice (LCCP), nor owed a general duty of care to its players.
The decision marks the conclusion to one of the most high-profile problem gambling cases in the UK courts since the 2008 Calvert v William Hill decision.
Despite its overwhelming popularity, crypto gambling in the UK remains in a legal gray area. All casino operators in the UK need to have a valid permit, as requ
Gambling in the UK is controlled under the Gambling Act 2005. This act requires all gambling operators to be licensed and regulated by the UK Gambling Commis
The UK Gambling Commission (UKGC) has initiated its third consultation period to gain feedback and proposals to make gambling machines in the UK more secure a
Mrs Durber sued PPB Entertainment Limited, which trades as Paddy Power and Betfair, for breach of contract and for the rest of her winnings, based on what she w