B2B Contract with conflicting terms
Now we always thought it was 12 months however this now throws a bit of an issue with us if the notice period is only 4 months due to them wanting some new systems at considerable cost to us.
Actual wording in the main body.
In the event company A or Company B wish to terminate or make major changes to any of the already agreed rounds then a minimum of 12 months should be given to the other party.
Wording in the small print
Subject to clause X and XX.x this agreement shall continue in force until either party terminates this agreement without liability to the other by giving four months notice in writing
Thoughts on if one takes precedence over the other?
Related
‘Game-Changing’ Probe Into UK Ticketing Business Launches Following Oasis Surge…
LONDON — The British government has launched a public consultation into the ticketing industry, including the heavily criticized use of dynamic pricing for
No 10 insists UK has sufficient energy supply despite ‘concerningly…
The UK has enough gas and electricity to meet demand this winter, the government has insisted, after the owner of the country’s largest gas stores said levels
UK Treasury chief heading to China to revive suspended economic…
LONDON -- Britain's Treasury chief is travelling to China this weekend to discuss economic and financial cooperation between the countries, as the U.K.'s Labour
UK debt market sell-off threatens to push up mortgage costs
About 700,000 homeowners are facing an increase in mortgage costs when their fixed-rate deals end this year, as a sell-off in the UK government debt market plun
