The report, Delivering value from government investment in major projects, gives a lacklustre image of the future of UK major infrastructure, warning that siloed government departments and the skills shortage will be significant obstacles to delivery.
The House of Commons backbench public accounts committee (PAC) said that government departments “devote too little time and effort ensuring that they maximise the value that comes from projects” and “too focused on the short term” and miss opportunities for added long-term value.
The Government Major Projects Portfolio includes nearly 250 projects, with an estimated total whole-life cost of £805bn, with a special focus on roads, rail, and energy.
Global competition for skills could drive up prices and has already led to “an overreliance on the supply chain, particularly in technical and engineering disciplines,” according to the report.
Nearly 1,000 government project professionals have passed through the government’s major project leadership academy, with this anticipated to double by March 2025. However, this is still only an eighth of the 16,000 accredited professionals needed.
“There are signs of improved cross-government working but government still struggles to establish effective governance and accountability arrangements on the most complex projects where multiple departments are involved,” the report says.
“There are government forums for the sharing of lessons about what works well in project delivery, such as the IPA-chaired Government Construction Board. However, learning across government departments still does not occur systematically, and departments must think more broadly about lessons in maximising long-term value, rather than just about lessons in delivering similar projects.”
Public Accounts Committee chair Dame Meg Hillier MP said, “Over the coming years, government spending on major infrastructure projects is set to rise to unprecedented levels. Such projects present unique and novel challenges which government must navigate if it is to secure value for public money. Without a robust market for essential skills in place, these are challenges the UK will fail to meet, as shortages push costs up in a globally competitive environment.
“All too often we see projects and programmes that are poorly managed and delivered late and over budget. The failure to ensure projects have robust impact evaluation plans in place is symptomatic of the short-term mentality dominating these processes. The government must encourage cross-departmental learning if we are to avoid repeating past mistakes.”
https://www.tipranks.com/news/the-fly/aecom-secures-positions-on-amp8-uk-water-infrastructure-frameworks Aecom (ACM) announced that it has achieved rec
In response to a parliamentary question from Earl Attlee regarding the UK’s readiness to address potential attacks on undersea telecommunications cables, the
Image credit: frimufilms/ Envato GCC countries are rapidly diversifying thei
The programme that funds higher education facilities in the UK is performing well, according to an interim report, and is successfully enhancing research infras